for spezia: my rating 8.0 there was maybe kinda compensation of the unjustified 10.0 ratings to be honest. Mappers like to complain about lower ratings but are not fair enough to remove or complain about unjustified 10.0 ratings ;) . Most of 10.0 ratings are not justified as most of the maps have weak points. My actuall rating would be something between 8 and 9 for spezia. critics for spezia are more or less the same I wrote for cortona.
for cortona: Of course I read your description carefully before reviewing, its also mentioned as a positive point in my review. Ok, u explain by yourself that u need to find the best compromise between level of detail and fps. As u focus very intensively onto fps optimization you cannot maximize the level of detail. Hence you cannot expect full points for both of these aspects. For detail u got 9/10 from me for the reasons I mentioned. There should be a rating for compromise between detail and fps/optimization. Coz thats what we are talking about. But to be honest, I would give u 9/10 for such a kind of aspect too. Not 10 points, coz I think on one side the fps are extremely high and on the other side the map looks very nice but just needs some props or decals especially at the floors to make it look distinctly realistic. With the plain and perfect clean floors it has a lack in realistic appearance. thats the point i think. :) Please don't get me wrong, but I told you a lot of aspects you did very very well, and your feedback was mainly focused on why the hell I mention any aspect for improvement (which seems that you think your map is 'perfect', what isn't good, as u would not be able to improve and accept any suggestions for improvments. And your maps are very good but not 'perfect' in my opinion ;)). Again, please dont get me wrong, I just wanna explain my point of view. Thanks for the great maps and I am looking forward to your next releases.