Banner

Repeat

End

Forums

HavenForts: Construct JetFists - The Chronicles of Wargasm (Episode 2, NeoForts)
  #1  
Old 05-19-2006
Gto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheesy bunker

The Cheesy bunker, is based on......well......i...guess...CHEESE lol.





Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2006
SwiftSpear's Avatar
Flag Capper
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: #2
Posts: 2,946
Default

Man, I'm gonna have a hard time adressing all of these :P

Next time make all of them in one fort so I can comment them all in a single thread.

Nice bunker design, solves many common bunker problems and uses only a few extra peices.
__________________
I JUMPED THIS FAR

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2006
Billeh's Avatar
Fwar?!
Flag Capper
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere or Other.
Posts: 3,810
Send a message via MSN to Billeh
Default

it cud get owned pretty easily
__________________
Eat crayons, poop rainbows!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2006
Gto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So could any bunker...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2006
SwiftSpear's Avatar
Flag Capper
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: #2
Posts: 2,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billeh_Bob
it cud get owned pretty easily
Why is this any easier to own then any other bunker? Granted it's in the middle of know where, but obviously someone acctually implimenting the design wouldn't do that.

It seems better then most of the single front faced bunkers from that respect, and you can extend back sheilds farther on this then on a normal single face bunker because it envelops the player better.

Lastly "It could get owned pretty easily" is a compleatly nonconstructive statement. If it doesn't work then it needs to have a reason it doesn't work, so either find the reason or don't say anything. I'd expect better from you then this petty flamebaiting.
__________________
I JUMPED THIS FAR

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2006
Billeh's Avatar
Fwar?!
Flag Capper
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere or Other.
Posts: 3,810
Send a message via MSN to Billeh
Default

Ok. It shud be multi layer'd have box's instead of 2d 2x1's and offer more protection from nades
__________________
Eat crayons, poop rainbows!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2006
Gto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When you make it come back and show me.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2006
SwiftSpear's Avatar
Flag Capper
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: #2
Posts: 2,946
Default

Why multilayer it? seems like a waste of blocks to me. How do you provide more nade protection? Nade protection isn't somthing you usually buid into a bunker, it's an afterthought you put up later to make the bunker location better. Why use boxes rather then 1x2? they would do exactly the same thing.
__________________
I JUMPED THIS FAR

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-21-2006
Flag Defence
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Default

You could fit more blocks into the bunker and it would taker longer to destroy is what he's trying to say I think. The blocks would be a bad idea though, people can climb them and if you designed it so they couldn't there would probably be areas that provide builders cover to destabilise it. The entire bunker would be rendered useless if a single piece was taken out so replacing large plates with smaller pieces would still be pretty much useless.
__________________
Remember me.. as a pimple on Society's ass...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-21-2006
DJ_Monkey_Pilot's Avatar
Uke
Fort Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,213
Send a message via MSN to DJ_Monkey_Pilot Send a message via Yahoo to DJ_Monkey_Pilot Send a message via Skype™ to DJ_Monkey_Pilot
Default

Placing a couple of these at opposite ends of a wall would have the same effect as Arch Inf's zig zag wall, I don't know if it was designed with that in mind but it looks like this design would be pretty good for taking advantage of the protrusions from that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

Tab