1 - does sf have its own rendition of blood gulch yet?
2a - if yes provide dl link
2b - if no should i make it?
3(hypo) - why shouldnt it be made?

__________________
Me 'n Fluffy moondance under the cover of the October sky until the sun comes up, then we have afternoon delight 'till it goes back down.

1. Yes, sf_skywalk.

2.
A - You have it.
B - No.

3. (hypo?) Halo is massive failure wrapped up in a delicious strip of bacon.

__________________

That is such an awful map, even for halo.

Being a Halo 3 fan, I'd have to say that map sucks dick.

L O L

Sounds like somebody couldnt afford a Xbox... or even worse went with the PS3 instead.

Maybe so, but I still think it would make a fun SF map.

True, but this is SF not Halo 3. We could get a SF version of Standoff but then we wouldnt need forts.

__________________
Me 'n Fluffy moondance under the cover of the October sky until the sun comes up, then we have afternoon delight 'till it goes back down.

Halo is a fun game for some mindless action with some friends, but beyond that, it's really not all that great. Certainly not the innovative masterpiece it's made out to be.

In any case, I fail to see how a map that is a large open canyon with two bases would in any way be a good map for a game that is built on the idea that players should make their own base. What would you do, just get rid of the bases that are already there so people could make their own? Then all you'd have is a big open canyon; hardly a great SF map.

My opinion is that Halo was the original game that started the huge xbox live scene. How you can't call that something is beyond me. Porting it to PC was a big mistake, since it was the type of game which was made for consoles. Not the other way around.

Also the deal about buildings and such already being in maps, last I checked that's what will be around in 2.0.0. Building bases along narrow alley ways, and next to houses. That type of thing. So really your point doesn't make much sense, especially if this map is for 2.0.0. Even a long Canyon with a few buildings added could actually play well, if the hilly areas are created properly. Although that's just my opinion.

Also on a side note, I'd like to know if you've even played Halo. Since people that pretend to know what they're talking about, and instead give some pseudo load of bollocks really annoy me.

Only fault for me is that I didn't like it in the Halo series, then again it could play extremely well in SF if done properly.

Too bad Halo 1 was made before Xbox Live and thus could not be played on Xbox live.

__________________
-=Suverin=- F41L
[Your signature was too large. -Stieffers]

Til' Halo 2, also nice thread rez's.

It may not have been revolutionary itself, but it was the advent of great FPS's on consoles...the first of its kind. It also had a great plot and campaign, ESPECIALLY the last level.

Then along came Halo 2, which was the advent of online gaming for consoles. The only game to really use XBL well was Crimson Skies (before Halo 2), and Halo 2 took it to the next level. Really, for many people, Halo 2 was the first good online game on a console. Which it kind of was. I remember playing Halo 2 on XBL for the first time--it was one of the greatest experiences I've ever had.

Also, to the OP, the reason Blood Gulch would make a terrible SF map is that building in SF is tedious. Not so much for building bases, but I would hardly call walling off 300+ meters fun. Now, if you were to make a SERIOUSLY scaled down version of BG, then I might consider playing it.

__________________
In-game Name: Bass Ackwards
L2GRAMMAR OR GTFO