Ok I have TF2, everyone says that 2.0 will be "something" like TF2. My question is if I made a map basically a replica of TF2 map would it be a complete waste of time? LOL How much "like TF2" is this going to be?

__________________
"I hope Draken and #'s will get picked up by communities that actually deserve them."

what's the "something"

class?
gameplay?

I wasn't aware that it was going to be anything like TF2...

__________________

More like TFC than TF2.

TFC had wonderful push maps - we actually alpha'd in map designs sto... borrowed from TFC.

If you make a balanced, linear map with clear chokepoints for building in, your map will be fine, as long as there is enough variety between the chokepoints to prevent it getting boring.

__________________
http://www.stieffers.com/Other/SF_Signature_Khuskan.gif

Any possible way I could see this map you guys have? Just to get a look...I've never played TF1...

__________________
"I hope Draken and #'s will get picked up by communities that actually deserve them."

I think I still have a copy of the map, assuming Khukan's talking about hv_warpath. I could share if Khuskan is alright with it (or Monty, because I think it was him who originally made it.)

Yeah it's hv_warpath he's talking about and Monty was the maker.

Monty also made a tiny corner of the map that looks really nice, I can't remember what it was called though.

__________________
God.

Original maps will work far better. I personally didn't feel warpath worked all that well, and isn't particurly accurate considering the tests we had had absolutley no class balancing whatsoever.

Walljumping was awesome on it though :P

It's the right sort of style though, map split by chokepoints. It was too large scale for our tests, and at the time of testing too many features were incomplete.

__________________
http://www.stieffers.com/Other/SF_Signature_Khuskan.gif