Comments on: What’s the difference between the classic Wayback Machine and the new BETA test version? http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/ Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:37:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Neil http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-807 Neil Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:39:16 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-807 Spectacular. The WayBackMachine has always been an incredible resource. The Beta version is a vast improvement to something that was already great. Kudos! Spectacular. The WayBackMachine has always been an incredible resource. The Beta version is a vast improvement to something that was already great. Kudos!

]]>
By: L Jack http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-683 L Jack Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:44:00 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-683 I preferred the old Wayback Machine. Calendar is <b>not</b> cool, it wastes a lot of space with nothing on it except for maybe one date that is hardly even highlighted. I prefer the old Wayback Machine because it did acquire the old pages and if it was parked you could search and find the archived website in the dates <b>before</b> it was parked, and/or before it changed hands. It truly archived the internet. This new version only gives a snapshot not an archive. Is there anyway to bring the Wayback Machine back to it's original higher standard? That said thank you for trying I preferred the old Wayback Machine. Calendar is not cool, it wastes a lot of space with nothing on it except for maybe one date that is hardly even highlighted. I prefer the old Wayback Machine because it did acquire the old pages and if it was parked you could search and find the archived website in the dates before it was parked, and/or before it changed hands. It truly archived the internet. This new version only gives a snapshot not an archive.

Is there anyway to bring the Wayback Machine back to it’s original higher standard?

That said thank you for trying

]]>
By: M http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-624 M Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:39:21 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-624 I vastly prefer the classic version's display of available pages. I vastly prefer the classic version’s display of available pages.

]]>
By: jim http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-580 jim Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:52:57 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-580 The only disappointment, I cant access website made from 1994 and 1995... The only disappointment, I cant access website made from 1994 and 1995…

]]>
By: rleens http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-563 rleens Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:24:48 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-563 forgot a great big happy Thank you!!! awesome People. helpers love if only a little ronnie before i move to anewway of being I wood love to let you all a enjoy a gift helpsomething to payit foward lovvvvvvvvve ronnie forgot a great big happy Thank you!!! awesome People.
helpers
love if only a little ronnie before i move to anewway of being I wood love to let you all a enjoy a gift helpsomething to payit foward

lovvvvvvvvve ronnie

]]>
By: rleens http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-562 rleens Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:12:32 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-562 Iam thankful for work that people invested and made something for those of us who only use and enjoy.ITS All Good Iam thankful for work that people invested and made something for those of us who only use and enjoy.ITS All Good

]]>
By: AstroFloyd http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-524 AstroFloyd Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:58:43 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-524 Very impressive. Knowing that it's open source makes it feel even better :-) Thanks! Very impressive. Knowing that it’s open source makes it feel even better :-) Thanks!

]]>
By: Matthew Southgate http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-452 Matthew Southgate Sat, 13 Aug 2011 03:47:09 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-452 Like the new speed. the old site was far to slow to make it much use. Like the new speed. the old site was far to slow to make it much use.

]]>
By: serge noiret http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-395 serge noiret Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:30:13 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-395 Of course the Internet Archive should be the default home page for many individual browser page... This to say how much th IA is important for worldwide culture today. So my question has to be embedded into such a context. Would it be possibl to serach in the archive like we search with Google and not only using a known URI ? That would be the most important improvement up to me. Thank you again for "being there" Of course the Internet Archive should be the default home page for many individual browser page… This to say how much th IA is important for worldwide culture today. So my question has to be embedded into such a context.
Would it be possibl to serach in the archive like we search with Google and not only using a known URI ? That would be the most important improvement up to me.
Thank you again for “being there”

]]>
By: ActionBurner http://faq.web.archive.org/whats-the-difference-between-the-classic-wayback-machine-and-the-new-beta-version/#comment-368 ActionBurner Sat, 16 Jul 2011 17:55:20 +0000 http://wayback.blog.archive.org/?p=6#comment-368 I agree with ND.Despite the faster performance,it would be better to have an option to choose between a calendar and the single page for archive of captured collections I agree with ND.Despite the faster performance,it would be better to have an option to choose between a calendar and the single page for archive of captured collections

]]>