2012-10-15
2012-10-23
PROGRAM
Book TV 19
( more )
STATION
MSNBCW 100
CNNW 85
CSPAN 61
CSPAN2 48
CURRENT 32
KGO (ABC) 22
CNBC 21
KQED (PBS) 16
FBC 15
KNTV (NBC) 13
KRCB (PBS) 11
KPIX (CBS) 9
KRON (MyNetworkTV) 9
SFGTV2 9
COMW 8
( more )
LANGUAGE
English 577

Set Clip Length:


op and at a rally, with condoleezza rice. you know, there are a lot of former george w. bush administration officials advising the romney campaign. but even they, you would think, would be sort of cognizant of how people view that administration, right? you think they would recognize that there is a little political peril in trying to underscore to a country that is really paying attention right now that everybody should expect a lot of continuity between the george w. bush years and a romney presidency. if you like the george w. bush years and you miss all those folks, like condoleezza rice, don't worry, if you elect romney, you'll see more of them again. this came up last night in what i thought was a brilliant question from one of the audience members at that debate at hofstra, and it got right at the central problem that the republicans have been dealing, since the support for romney creatored during the george w. bush second term. the greatest show on earth has been the republican party figuring out who it is after bush and cheney. the republican party figuring out if th

says i'm talking about the two bush's, talking about how books shape policies towards the people of the book and with the presidents of rwanda israel and it's been important on how the president's approach israel and we have to start -- i know you're going to have a separate conversation but we do really have to start with harry truman. if you go back to 1948 and 47, 48, it wasn't clear that the united states was going to be an ally of israel and it's not clear the u.s. was going to support a creative state and the u.s. was going to recognize israel. these are open questions that in fact many of the questions the state department was not in the right place. a big shock for anybody that follows the state department. the state apartment wasn't in the right place and wasn't as supportive as israel, and in fact the secretary of state threatened to resign if truman went ahead with pro-israel position. they did have the u.s. approach to create the partition. he had the u.s. recognize israel and these are important statements that he made. one of the things i read in the recent argument

to tie romney's economic plans to what bush did, and, you know, bush came in. bush said i'm going to cut taxes and decrease regulations and the economy is going to take off, and he did that and the economy went like that. i think obama needs to say why should we go back to the thing that created the crisis. i think he needs to talk specifically to the women. that's a very frightening thing for obama. he needs to talk specifically to women. he needs to try to reintroduce the plutocrat theme. just last month, romney was a bumbling pluto crat. and he need an agenda. >> jennifer: okay. do you think hitting him for example on bain, is that going to be effective in turning romney back into the guy who fired american workers and outsourced american jobs. is that sort of the thrust of where the president should go? >> it all depends on how he says it, and the circumstances that it comes up under, but, yes, i think it has a lot of possible. romney has been talking about china on the stump, and i think that opening up the option for obama to talk about china. and then there is th

. >> so when we see president obama were president bush standing a lot of time in florida and in ohio, that right there is the key? >> right. what sparked the idea for this book is president bush's first term, president george w. bush, the time he spent in ohio, florida, pennsylvania, and you can certainly find examples of presidents attending to the electoral concerns, but i said what we see if we look at it systematically, if we looked at it over decades, with the presidents do, what patterns would play out and is there a disproportionate focus on the electoral matters to the estimates and what did you fight? >> the short answer is that we have seen a substantial increase in the time that presidents devote to electoral concerns. and the clear indicator is fund-raising. if a president goes to ohio to years before the election is either because it is one of the largest states because he cares about the good people of ohio or because it is likely to edge in the presidential election? that is a bit harder to say, but what is unambiguously electoral is the presidential fund-raising. and

, problems with w., a question about former president george w. bush throughs romney for a loop. we will ponder his head scratching answer involving venezuelans next on "now." ♪ i'd like to thank eating right, whole grain, multigrain cheerios! mom, are those my jeans? [ female announcer ] people who choose more whole grain tend to weigh less than those who don't. multigrain cheerios >>> perhaps most notorious and least discussed republican of the 2012 election is former president george w. bush. someone mitt romney would prefer to keep in the recesses of the american imagination, unsurprisingly when asked about the elephant in the room last night, and how his policies differ from w.'s, romney was less than forthcoming. >> thank you. i appreciate that question. i just want to make sure that i think i was supposed to get that last answer but i want to point out that i don't believe -- >> i don't think so, candy. i want to make sure our time keepers are working here. >> after a brief detour romney finally answered the question by focusing on venezuela. >> president bush and i are dif

clinton. in the 1980 republican primary george bush had moment against ronald reagan, until in the debate in new hampshire, there was a moment where reagan looked strong. >> i am paying for this microphone. >> that moment helped change the campaign. >> some o some of them you can . >> read my lips. no newaxes. >> the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull, lipstick. >> other ones, you got to depend on your ndidate seizing a moment you didn't expect to happen. >> there you go again. >> most moments so far this election have been poorly phrased comments. >> if you've got a business, you didn't build that. somebody else made that happen. >> i like bng able to fire people that provide services to me. >> they'll put y'all back in chains. >> the media call those gaffes, but often the media don't know. when ed musky lost the '072 primary because he looked like he teared up defending his wife, everyone said candidates can't career, because that's week, but then in 2008 hillary clinton cried. >> you know, i have so many opportunities from this country. >> she began to tear up. >> don't wan

of a negotiation was started in the bush administration. what he did was hold up free trade agreements for three years while american manufacturers were locked out of those markets. that is not a trade policy that engages in the global trading system and takes our seat at the table with an effort to design the rules in ways that not only serve our interest you incapable of saying i want good in those markets. we go to break down barriers. but just as important, adopting the system we have in the united states is the most powerful thing we can do for economic development. so the idea but my state capitalism to run rampant and are not willing to engage in negotiations shaping the growth, do we define our future to make it greater globally. >> i respond to that? >> i very much like rants previous answer, by the way. look, first there were two big disagreements we have. first of all, the president takes credit for the three south korea panels. let me tell you something. signing a trade agreement and getting a trade agreement over the kind of pump that we did is far, far more difficult. penalty was t

to continue to have the bush tax cuts for millionaires. that is $8 trillion. what he says is he will make sure it does not add to the deficit, and he will cut middle-class taxes. when he is asked, how will you do it? which deductions, which loopholes, he cannot tell you. the fact that he only has to pay 14% on his taxes, when a lot of you are paying much higher, he is already taking that off the board. capital gains will continue to be at a low rate. we will not get money that way. we have not heard from the governor any specifics beyond big bird and eliminating funding for planned parenthood, in terms of how he pays for that. governor romney was a very successful investor. if somebody came to you, governor, with a plan that says, i want to spend $8 trillion, and we will pay for it, but we cannot tell you until after the election how we will do it, you would not have taken such a sketchy deal. neither should you, the american people. the math does not add up. what is at stake here is one of two things. either, candy, this blows up the deficit. keep in mind, this is just to pay for the additio

. after the prediction the economy got worse under bush and the beginning of the obama term. so obama didn't say it. and it was actually much worse because of the republicans. nonetheless he did made an effective case for people who don't know all the facts. you want to keep going governor romney. >> obama: please proceed governor. >> cenk: all right let's proceed to the worse moment for romney. are you different than george w. bush. look at this terrible answer. >> romney: president bush and i are different people and these are different times. we can now by virtue of new technology get all the energy we need in north america without having to go to the arabs or venezuelans, that wasn't true in his time. number two trade, i would expand trade in latin america. i'll present a balanced budget. president bush didn't. president obama is right. it was outrageous to have deficits of. >> cenk: that's the best you got? we don't need the arabs any more and i'm going to kick some chinese ass? that was horrible. do you know why he doesn't have a good answer? because he does have the same plan as geo

prescott bush, said, and i quote, "if his father were alive today, i'm sure his father would see it as a shocking transformation." is senator hatfield right? >> what was he referring to? >> he was referring to your performance in the campaign. >> i think my dad would be pretty proud of me, because i think we've come a long, long way and i think, you know three months ago, i remember some of the great publications in this country had written me off. and what i've had to do is define, not just my position, but to define his and i hope i've done it fairly. and the reason i've had to do that is that he ran on the left in the democratic primary, ran firmly and ran with conviction and ran on his record. and then at that democratic convention, they made a determination and they said there, ideology doesn't matter, just competence. and in the process the negatives began. it wasn't me that was there at that convention. thank god i was with jimmy baker camping out and i didn't have to hear all the personal attacks on me out of that democratic convention. and i'm not the one that compared t

locked in, the spending on that will increase. he's got the tax cuts, the rates from the bush years. >> rates are going rise. >> they're expiring. they're going to go up automatically. all of this is baked in. he just needs to basically preside over it and he gets a huge part of his agenda continuing. >> well, we'll see. i mean, he ran on -- in 2008 with a message of hope, and hope would really be the theme of a second term, hope that the world's investors will continue to lend us money, even as he continues to run massive deficits. we've been lucky with rates so low. we're paying $200 billion a year, the government, just in interest. normalize $600 billion a year. that's basically medicare just in interest on the debt every year. so i think hope that the world's markets will continue to fund his spending would be a key issue. >> fingers crossed. >> yeah. >> kim, what about the prospects of a budget deal , and republicans hold the house, are we going to get a big debt bargain? >> this is going to be ugly. one of the problems, i don't think republicans have necessarily thought entire

w. bush? >> a former bush aide has got something to say about that, ari fleischer joins me live. >>> plus, one issue comes up for the very first time in this year's face-offs. >> he called the arizona law a model for the nation. >> how each candidate took on immigration head on. >>> and first his sport, now his charity. and a major sponsor. the walls are closing in on lance armstrong. jen's car wasn't handling well. so i brought it to mike at meineke. we gave her car a free road handling check. i like free. free is good. my money. my choice. my meineke. >>> we have been talking a lot about the claims and the counterclaims last night between republican challenger mitt romney and president obama. now we look at how they differed on immigration reform. again, here is tom foreman. he reins in the rhetoric and cuts to the facts. tom? >> republicans have been going after president obama for months saying he has not engaged the issue of illegal immigration. listen to how mitt romney attacked him and how the president responded. >> why did he fail to -- even promote legislation that wou

there was that question to mitt romney about george w. bush, how he would be different, a potentially predictionly question. he handled it pretty well with regard to the answer he needed to give, talking about the fact that under the bush years the deficits were racked up, there was too much spending, he wouldn't do that. lastly, kind of broadly, you saw in that piece, and anybody who watched last night, he did hold his own on the stage with the president of the united states. some might argue too much so, some might argue that maybe he went a little too far, was too aggressive but he certainly did. you bet today that is making the base of his party, which is so critical, very happy. >> i'm sure you're right about that. okay. now for you, jessica. what three things did the president do the best? >> reporter: well, first of all, he corrected the biggest mistakes of his first debate. he he came to play. he was feisty. he was alive. he looked up and watched mitt romney the whole time. he looked like he was fighting to keep the job. he came with a narrative. first time didn't look like he came with a

by a former george bush advisor. and the others are a blog post and a "wall street journal" op-ed by a mitt romney adviser. calling those things studies is like calling me the homecoming queen. it's very flattering, but come on. the romney campaign has been trying to wish away the math with this six studies magical incantation. they have been trying to use this six studies thing for so long that even the sunday morning show on fox is calling bullpucky on it. >> six studies have said -- >> those are very questionable. some of them are blogs. some are from an independent group. >> these are very credible sources. >> one is from a blog from a guy who was a top adviser to george w. bush. >> see why ed gillespie doesn't look worried there? he's waiting for the interviewer to stop talking. he's just kind of waiting. i'm just going to go back to my talking points. there's a happy-go-luckiness. they don't get too stressed out because they know that politically, it doesn't matter what they say. they trust no matter what they are proposing and how it gets debunked, they know politically they will jus

. mr. bush says we are going to put the irs on every taxpayer. that's not what we are going to do. i'm for the taxpayer bill of rights. but i think it's unconscionable, ann, that we should be talking or thinking about imposing new taxes on average americans when there are billions out there, over $100 billion, in taxes owed that aren't being paid. now, i think if we work together on it, and if you have a president that will work with the congress and the american people, we can bring that deficit down steadily, $20, $25, $30 billion a year, build economic growth, build a good strong future for america, invest in those things which we must invest in economic development, good jobs, good schools for our kids, college opportunity for young people, decent health care and affordable housing, and a clean and safe environment. we can do all of those things, and at the same time build a future in which we are standing on a good strong fiscal foundation. senator bentsen said, as you recall at the debate with senator quayle, that if you give any of us $200 billion worth of hot checks a year, w

vulnerabilitiment he had no answer and it showed. >> what's did biggest difference between you and george w. bush and how do you differentiate yourself from george w. bush? >> great. thank you. and i appreciate that question. i just want to make sure that i think i was supposed to get that last answer but i want to point out that i don't believe -- >> so biggest vulnerability, looks evasive and gets around to say it's different because of no china and obama care and balancing the budget. that's the problem. the economic prescription, tax prescription proposing is bush -- it's identical. cut the taxes and worry about the deficit later. the woman that's interviewed and said she is not satisfied with romney's answer and wants to give obama four more years. >> i chose the same answer and obama's part of the answer with tying romney to bush with is the similarities and following romney said, he's worse than bush. >> george bush didn't propose turning medicare in to a voucher. george bush embraced comprehensive immigration reform. he didn't call for self deportation. george bush never suggested that he

when the bush presidency came to an end. he was forced out 2007. the prime target of the two biggest scandals with valerie plame and united states attorney scandal. bush left the white house with 22 percent approval, the lowest in history even ed rollins said his brand was tainted fervor nobody would want to work with karl rove. fact is he was back working within weeks. it became evident to me one year after obama's took office three things happened. first coming from the united states supreme court no person that i can think of has benefited more from the supreme court then call growth. 2000 was bush vs. gore putting him in the white house. number two. 2010, citizens united decision that opened the floodgates for unlimited courage additions from secret sources with no transparency that is unprecedented in history. second, win if michael steele running the republican party could not raise a dime. it came early 2010 there was a revelation and moss angeles that the rnc had been entertaining donors at a lesbian bondage theme strip club. that did not work too well. this scarecrow wrote h

to george w. bush. >> see why ed gillespie doesn't look worried there? he's waiting for the interviewer to stop talking. he's just kind of waiting. i'm just going to go back to my talking points. there's a happy-go-luckiness. they don't get too stressed out because they know that politically, it doesn't matter what they say. they trust no matter what they are proposing and how it gets debunked, they know politically they will just seem like they are going to be good on the deficit. no matter what they propose. this is the most persistent myth in the modern politics in american money. the idea that republican presidents are good on the deficit. when, in fact, the exact opposite is our modern history. we learned the budget deficit topped a trillion dollars for the fourth year in a row. here's the context for that. here's our budget deficit in 2012. just over a trillion dollars. and here's what it was last year. president obama actually cut the deficit by more than $200 billion from the year before. here's the budget deficit that president obama was handed when he walked in the door. your

. the thing i see is the jump in wisconsin from '04 to '08. a lot of bush voters switched over to obama. a very big number. it seems like there might be a bigger pool of potential swing voters. >> i think a couple months ago they felt good they were going to secure wisconsin. it started to change when he chose paul ryan as his running mate. it certainly helps. i'm certain the romney campaign thut th put that into your calculus when they chose paul ryan. >> you talk about the era of the american campaign is over. i think the map has changed very little since 2002. this sounds like a bad dwoemt for the nation. there's an eight to 10-day swing where candidates pay attention to. can you talk about why it is bad for the nation? only a small groups will be paid tae attention to in national elections. >> we saw this in the primaries where the candidates spent so much time in south carolina, new hampshire and iowa. it's ironic. you think it was set up so it would be more equal so more states have more of a representation. here we are just focusing on a couple of states. it's not that voters don

of the crazy call with all the bush is hitler bumper stickers on the back of the car. [laughter] you know, think the checkout help with the master's degree in gender studies wearing a head band at your local whole foods store. you get the picture; right? [laughter] they dominate professions leaving a large cultural imprint in the country of ours, professions like journalism, arts, academia, and america's fastest growing band of entertainers, circumstance day sew lay acrobats. who are these people who call themselves liberals? how does such a small group impact our lives? what motivates them? well, i'm in an excellent position to answer the deep questions because i've been watching liberals closely for over 30 years, i studied liberal s jane goodall studies chimps in their natural habitats and without judgment, in silence mostly because we bailey speak the same language. tireless in liberals, humored them, teaseed them, prodded them, and, yes, loved some of them. best friends are liberals, some members of my own family. now, my commitment to understanding liberals sometimes worried by good

's different from george bush. george bush didn't propose turning medicare into a voucher. george bush embraced comprehensive immigration reform. he didn't call for self-deportation. george bush never suggested that we eliminate funding for planned parenthood. so there are differences between governor romney and george bush. but they're not on economic policy. in some ways he's gone to a more extreme place when it comes to a social policy. >> welcome back from hofstra university for a special post-debate "hardball" tonight. our third "hardball" tonight. tonight president obama and mitt romney were for more engaged than the last debate. mitt romney's overly aggressive interrupting, both after the president and the moderator may not wear well with women voters. let's talk about the physicality, the mixing it up. i thought romney -- maybe this is just me -- looks like a big shot ceo who walks in the room and thinks he owns any room he walks in. and he starts pushing. it's almost physical. swats them away like flies. he knows they make less than him, and he treats them that way. you know what i'm t

the case against president bush for having gas prices go above $4 is what? >> i think president bush was hurt by the fact that gas prices were over $4. >> i think there's a huge difference and the difference is over the past four years. take a look at the keystone pipeline. why did the president veto that? north american oil from a friendly country. so when you look at why we are where we are today there are to questions there are some reasons but there are also obama policies. oil, weak, global commodities. when you weaken the u.s. dollar year after year. when you go through the deflation, inflation of the money supply, the u.s. dollar goes down. gasoline goes up. wheat goes up. clothing goes up. we haven't seen inflation impact society at large, families are being hurt by this. families that need to pay for that extra meal at home. i think it's been very disappointing to the american people. >> i want to get to the detailed side of the romney tax plan that he's not willing to discuss, which is the deductions. he says he wants to cut rates and eliminate deductions that fill in the f

's not asking for them. that's $7 trillion. he also wants to continue the bush tax cuts for the wealthiest americans. that's another trillion dollars. that's $8 trillion. now, what he says is he's going to make sure that this doesn't add to the deficit, and he's going to cut middle-class taxes, but when he's asked how are you going to do, which deductions, which loopholes are you going to close, he can't tell you. the fact that he only has to pay 14% on his taxes when a lot of you are paying much higher, you know, he's already taken that off the board, capital gains are going to continue to be at a low rate, so we're not going to get money that way. we haven't heard from the governor any specifics beyond big bird and eliminating funding for planned parenthood in terms of how he pays for that. now governor romney was a successful investor. if somebody came to you with a plan that said, here, i want to spend $7 trillion or $8 trillion, and we're going to pay for it, but we can't tell you until maybe after the election how we're going to do it, you wouldn't have taken such a sketchy deal. and

for a politician. how did he do? on the subject of embryonic stem cells, you might remember when george w. bush banned embryonic stem cells but he didn't. he never banned it. that was, we will be generous and say misinformation perpetuated by the media. he never banned stem cells. he did not limit funding to preexisting cell lines in 20 ones dems have lines were available after 2001. obama promised to fix that so he issued an executive order on march 92009. what did that do? it lifted the ban the quote unquote bandh van on federal funding so today as the time i put this talk together a month ago there were 178 stem cell lines available for federal funding but 160 lines available globally so we increased it from 21 lines to 178 lines. most notably, they must be derived. embryonic stem cells must be derived from leftover in vitro fertilization embryos and permission is required from parents. that has the effect of really limiting the number of embryonic stem cells that you can get. so the idea that the doors open on embryonic stem cell research is fiction. he did not. george bush left the door op

george w. bush banned embryonic stem cells. well, he didn't. he never banned it. that was a, we'll be generous and say misinformation perpetuated by the media. he never banned embryonic stem cells. he did limit federal funding to pre-existing stem line, and about 23 stem cell lines were available as of 2001. obama issued an executive order on march 9 of 2009. what did that do? it lifted the ban, the quote-unquote ban, on federal funding. so today as of the time i put this talk together about a month ago, there are 178 embryonic stem cell lines available for federal funding, but there are 760 lines available globally. so he increased it from about 21 lines to 178 lines. most notably, they must be derived, these embryonic stem cells must be derived from left over invitro fertilization embryos, and permission is required from parents. that has the effect of really limiting the number of embryonic stem cells that you can get, okay? so the idea that he blew the doors open on embryonic stem cell research is a fiction. he did not. george bush nudged the door open to embryonic stem cell

, they will get him. if he becomes the mitt romney of the debate, we are talking george w. bush or worse. if the first thing he does is make a compromise with the democrats, watch out. when i talked to him about this, at least the people in relative leadership roles -- david kirvish talked about this, too. they are well aware that the republican party wants to coopt them. their argument is that they got, what did before. their argument is that it will stay outside and we will keep a close eye on them so we are always prepared to back them. that is hard to do. -- always prepared to hit them. that is hard to do. >> many tea partiers look at the senate as a sort of insurance policy. there are a lot of battles where rand paul type candidates are running. if they can win a tea party caucus and work as strategy, and only put bills on mitt romney's desk that would force his hand, he would veto them, but he probably would not drive it as far as those folks. the budget might look more like what rand paul proposes rather than what brahney proposes. -- down what mitt romney proposes. >> and to the

though the military is not asking for them. that's $7 trillion, he also wanting to continue the bush tax cuts for the wealthiest americans, that's $8 trillion. now what he says is, he's going to make sure that this doesn't add to the deficit and he's going to cut middle class taxes, but when he's asked how are you going to do it, which deducti deductions, which loopholes are you going to close? he can't tell you. the fact that he only has to pay 14% on his taxes when a lot of you are paying much higher. he's already taken that off the board, capital gains are going to continue to be at a low rate, so we're not going to get money that way. we haven't heard from the governor any specifics beyond big bird and eliminating funding for planned parenthood in terms of how he pays for that. now, governor romney was a very successful investor. if somebody came to you, governor with a plan that said i want to spend $7 trillion to $8 trillion, and we can't pay for it and we won't tell you until after the election how we're going to do it, you wouldn't have taken such a steppy deal and the american p

. that is $7 trillion. he also wants to continue to which it have the bush cut -- the bush tax cuts for millionaires. as $8 trillion. what he says is he will make sure it does not add to the deficit, and he will cut middle- class taxes. when he is asked, how will you do it? which deductions, which loopholes, he cannot tell you. the fact that he only have to pay 14% on his taxes, when a lot of you are paying much higher, he is already taking that off the board. capital gains will continue to be at a low rate. we will not get money that way. we have not heard from the governor any specifics beyond, big bird and eliminating fun and -- funding for planned parenthood, in terms of how he pays for that. governor romney was a very successful investor. if somebody came to you, governor, with a plan that says, i want to spend eight trillion dollars -- $8 trillion, and we will pay for it, but we cannot tell you until after the election how we will do it, you would not have taken such a sketch the deal. neither should you, the american people. the math does not add up. what is at stake here is

microtarget, women, hispanics, check. and those who don't remember the bush years fondly. >> in what new ways do you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females. >> what do you plan on doing with immigrants without their green card that are currently living here as productive members of the society. >> since both you and president bush are republicans, i fear a return to the policies of those years should you win this election. >> the president seemed to relish the idea on pay equity while governor romney ignored it altogether and talked about appointing women. >> we fixed that. that's an example of the kind of advocacy that we need. >> we took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had background who could be qualified to become members of our cabinets. i went to women groups and said, can you help us find them and they brought us binders of women. >> awkward for governor romney on several questions one man stumbled and one pounced. the president was asked by a 2008 supporter why he should be elected for the second term. >> what have you done

romney is different than george bush. let me play that answer for you. >> president bush had a very different path, very different time. my path is designed in getting small businesses to grow and help people. >> george bush didn't propose turning medicare into a voucher. george bush embraced comprehensive immigration reform. he didn't call for self-deportation. george bush never suggested that we eliminate funding for planned parenthood. so there are differences between governor romney and george bush but they are not on economic policy. in some ways he's gone to a more extreme place when it comes to social policy. >> now, what's interesting about that, rick, you've got governor romney saying the difference between bush and himself is different eras, different time. you have the president really dealing with the bigger issue of how the republican party has shifted on social issues even more to the right than george bushes time and really raising some specifics. what's happened to the party and romney that is the personification of the party 2012 as opposed to george bush who did re

right above where they are now. so the case against president bush for having gas prices go above $4 is what? >> i think president bush was hurt by the fact that gas prices were over $4. >> i think there's a huge difference and the difference is over the past four years. take a look at the keystone pipeline. why did the president veto that? north american oil from a friendly country. so when you look at why we are where we are today there are to questions there are some reasons but there are also obama policies. oil, weak, global commodities. when you weaken the u.s. dollar year after year. when you go through the deflation, inflation of the money supply, the u.s. dollar goes down. gasoline goes up. wheat goes up. clothing goes up. we haven't seen inflation impact society at large, families are being hurt by this. families that need to pay for that extra meal at home. i think it's been very disappointing to the american people. >> i want to get to the detailed side of the romney tax plan that he's not willing to discuss, which is the deductions. he says he wants to cut rates and elim

of them is a from a guy who -- a blog from a top adviser to george w. bush. these are hardly nonpartisan studies. >> chris, i think if you look at harvard and aei, they are very credible sources. >> you wouldn't say that aei is a conservative think tank? >> it's a light leaning think tank but that doesn't make it uncredible. >> it doesn't make it partisan. >> two blogs from the conservative think tank, american enterprise institute. another nonpartisan study is from the conservative think tank, the heritage foundation. their own website said that it's a paper written by, ready for this one, a former bush adviser. study number five, five says -- is written by "the wall street journal," an op ed written by an adviser to the romney campaign. and lucky number six is another blog post written again by the same adviser to the romney campaign. this is the kind of campaign he's running. i mean, have we ever seen anything like this in politics? mr. romney wants the american people to trust him. but how can you trust a man who has no problem bending the truth to 67 million americans? joining me no

in their work. >> you've been quoted as refering to george w. bush as our greatest president and you defended the bush administration decision to go to war in iraq as well as his handling of hurkhurk dow still support that? >> it's not a statement i ever made certainly after 9/11 when president bush faced anta tack on our nation, i thought he did a great job of uniting the nation and developing a plan. he believed that iraq had weapons of mass destruction and so did our allies in europe. it was than basis that the united states congress voted for our country to go to your. this is not something a president can do on their own. there were also 30 other nations who were involved in that effort. i think at the time based on the information that we knew, the president did a good job for the nation. but the quote she mentioned never happened. >> your rebuttal. >> i'm astounded because she admitted it and i see chad blair here. you should fact check this. she continues to be a partisan supporter and a cheerleader for george w. bush, his decision to go to iraq which and i'm proud of the fact that ou

of the main officials involved demanding answers. they didn't president bush, and maybe we would've gotten answers before yesterday. megyn: laura ingram, thank you so much. well, a bankruptcy announcement by a battery company. taxpayer investment of almost $400 million. we will take a close look at the ever-growing green and energy ventures that are eating up some of your money. and questions swirling tonight. remember both campaigns complained about candy crowley and her questions of last week's debate. we are learning of an 11 hour change of tonight's debate format. we will talk about that decision. and also, a young girl and sticking her head out of a moving train. that story is just ahead i gave birth to my daughter on may 18th, five days later, i had a massive heart attack. bayer aspirin was the first thing the emts gave me. now, i'm on a bayer aspirin regimen. [ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. [ woman ] learn from my story. megyn: a reckless prank that could have ended in tragedy. watch this. >> [inaudible] megyn: a young girl in a

by the bush administration under the iran sanctions act in eight years. 0. when the president came into office, he very aggressively moved on the sanctions using existing treasury department authorities. he then worked with the congress almost immediately to sign a new comprehensive piece of legislation, of which multiple companies across the world, including chinese companies, including russian companies, have been sanctioned. the 20 exemptions that he likes to talk about were a wholly different piece of authority, which granted the president the authority to exempt countries that made substantial reductions in their oil imports from iran. south korea, in fact, cut off their imports. turkey reduced, india reduced, and in fact, china reduced. it was specifically targeted at the banking sector -- congress authorized the exemptions leaving 20 countries off the hook, and in fact, we have made crippling sanctions. when i hear the other side talk about, we are really going to do this on our own -- we have had an embargo against iran for 30 years. the fact is for crippling sanctions, you do need int

on military spending they do not want, and $ trillion in the bush tax cuts. he says he wants to make sure it does not add to the deficit. when he is asked -- deficit -- what he will close, he won't say. the fact he pays 14% on his taxes -- capital gains are going to continue to be a low rate. we won't get money that way. we haven't heard any specifics besides big bird and planned parenthood in terms of how he pays for that. gov. romney was a successful investor. if someone said, "i want to spend 7 or $8 trillion buand i can't pay for it, but i won't say how -- he wouldn't thake ake the sketchy deal and neither would you. what's at stake is that this blows up the deficit. this is just to pay for the additional spending he's talking about, the $8 trillion. or alternatively, they have to close you will pay for this. >> let me get the governor in on this. before we get into what study says what. if there is not enough tax revenue coming in, would you be willing to look at a 20%. >> of course they add up. i was someone who ran businesses for 25 years and balanced the budget. i ran the olympics

been talking about if not for the libya moment was what i thought was a miss on the bush question, right? he gets the question that i think is this sort of lingering question out there with some swing voters, particularly say in the upper midwest, the ohio, iowa, portion of this -- of these battleground states and yet it was, hey, i am going to be tougher on china, i am going to be more free trade, he didn't seem to have a solid answer of what makes me different than bush and then the president in there clearly was ready with his talking points. i will tell yo tell you how he s different from bush, hits him on medicare and on immigration. so it was almost a reverse of here you have the president with a plan and he executed it tonight, mitt went in there thinking hey it is up to the presidentit is almost seethe, ceding turf at different moments which i thought was ahead scratcher considering how well prepared he was in that first debate charlie. >> back in a moment, john dickerson. >> well, charlie, i think, you know, there was -- you wondered at one point if there was a part in t

for the republican party to recover from the disaster of the bush/cheney years. did they learn anything from that disaster? did it change them? how did it change them? how is the new face of the party after george w. bush and how is that person different from bush? they are trying to make the new face of the party mitt romney, but because mr. romney has no experience at all on foreign policy and no apparent deep interest in it, either, his foreign policy advisers have been telling reporters they don't even think he reads their briefing papers on foreign policy. because mr. romney said even the war we are currently fighting was not important enough to him to make it into his convention speech, because the republicans have nominated somebody with no foreign policy chops whatsoever, the republican presidential campaign this year just carried over the george w. bush/kidick cheney foreign policy core wholesale. they have paul ryan an the campaign trail this week with condoleezza rice. dick cheney wasn't available? dick cheney is available, he'll be fund-raising for mitt romney in dallas after the

for something like that, no more than president bush was responsible for 9/11. i don't hold president obama responsible for what happened in libya. >> all right. those are sort of the takeaways on the highs and lows, but some of the topics that got everybody talking here, wolf. >> you got an intelligent group of undecided voters in that focus group, erin, thank you very much. >> very informed, wolf. >> they are very informed. thank them for me, please. and for our viewers. by the way, we did check for president obama, he had three low points throughout the debate, mitt romney, according to these people in this focus group, had seven lows. up next, tom foreman's keeping them honest with another reality check. this time about illegal immigration. and in just a few minutes, you'll be able to see an encore presentation of this historic debate in its entirety. [ ross ] the streets of monaco, home of the legendary grand prix circuit. the perfect place to bring the all-new cadillac ats to test the 2.0-liter turbo engine. [ engine revs ] ♪ [ derek ] 272 horsepower. the lightest in its class. the

in cuts, plus $2 trillion in defense and wants to continue the bush tax cuts. now we're up to 8 trillion and romney says but trust me, that's not going to add to the deficit because i'm going to have all kind of offsets against deductions which he will not name. president obama said hey you wouldn't take that deal. >> if somebody came to you governor with a plan that said here i want to spend seven or $8 trillion and we're going to pay for it, but we can't tell you until maybe after the election how we're going to do it you wouldn't have taken such a sketchy deal, and neither should you, the american people, because the math doesn't add up. >> bill: i love that. >> sketchy deal! fuzzy math! >> that is a phrase that's going to hang in there sketchy deal. i love that. then the very last question was sort of a lame question, i thought, so what is the worst thing that the other side has said about you in this campaign. i'm paraphrasing. mitt romney said the worst thing is they have misrepresented me. what was the bush phrase? i've been. >> misunderestimated. >> i've been misunderestimated th

to determine whether or not people have social security in place. had we allow that to happen under the bush of administration, we have seen what it is has done to the housing market. just imagine what that would have caused to so many people dependent upon social security. he also wants to turn to karen to a voucher program. he says the rain budget was a good place to start. if that is a good place to start it is where medicare will and. i will protect and preserve it. he wants to turn it into a voucher. tarkanian: if there was a new job created for every certification my opponent has made about my policy position the unemployment rate would have doubled under his leadership. i never said those things and quite frankly i believe us as individuals know what is best and we should give us the opportunity to do so. we don't need government telling us that. >> thank you. senator horsford for the next question. during the state legislature you were wanting to eliminate tax reductions for the mining industry. you advocated the elimination of industries tax protections enshrined in the state consti

election between george w. bush and al gore. he never talks about religion because he is an arab. host: what do you think about campaign 2012 and your vote? have you decided who you are voting for? caller: yes. host: well, we are talking to undecided voters this morning. robert, michigan, are you with us? caller: [unintelligible] host: we are having some phone trouble there, so we're going on to our next call. gino, rhode island. caller: i just want to talk about the fact that i want to see someone say something about our inadequate tax laws. you have these foreign corporations, american corporations that operate overseas and pay no taxes. companies like general electric, apple, mobile, exxon, they make huge amounts of money. they have to dollar or $3 trillion and will not bring that-- they have $2 trillion or $3 trillion and will not bring that money into the united states unless they get some kind of special tax deal. the last time they repatriated any money it was at 5%. these corporation should be paying 30%. they want to wait until they pass a wall where they can bring the money b

nacionales e internacionales, al gobierno de bush. y ya que tanto usted como el presidente bush son republicanos. y temo que volver a la polÍticas de aquellos aÑos y es gana estas elecciones. cuÁl es la diferencia entre usted y george w bush. y como se diferencia usted del expresidente bush. >>> gracia aprecio esa pregunta. quiero asegurar sobre la Última respuesta. yo no. no creo candy. quiero asegurarnos que el cronÓmetro funciona. . >>> dejanme decirles que la Última parte es para que los dos hablen no necesariamente de ese orden utilice los 2 minutos de la forma que quiera. la pregunta se ha hecho. >>> no creo que los burÓcratas en washington deberÍan decir a una persona si puede tomar contraceptivo o no que leos empleadores decidan si pueden tener el tipo de acceso. las mujeres deben tener acceso. lo que dijo el presidente sobre la polÍtica. >>> gobernador estÁ equivocado. >>> quiero responder su pregunta. >>> presidente bush y yo somos personas distintas y Épocas distintas y mi plan de 5 puntos es diferente a lo que habrÍa hecho por ejemplo, nosotros en este moment

't like each other. >>> just ahead, they prepped george w. bush and al gore for their big debates. now our team of insiders will tell you which candidate they think came out on top be tonight. but don't just listen to me. listen to these happy progressive customers. i plugged in snapshot, and 30 days later, i was saving big on car insurance. with snapshot, i knew what i could save before i switched to progressive. the better i drive, the more i save. i wish our company had something this cool. you're not filming this, are you? aw! camera shy. snapshot from progressive. test-drive snapshot before you switch. visit progressive.com today. those little things for you, life's about her. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask i

of views. >> what is the biggest difference between you and george w. bush? and how do you make a difference between yourself and george w. bush? >> thank you, i appreciate that question, i just want to make sure, i think i was supposed to get that last answer, but i want to point out -- >> i don't believe it, candy, i want to make sure the time keepers are working. >> romney did go on to explain he and george bush were different people with different policies, katz was put off by his manner. >> he took time to continue the debate on another issue before he addressed the question. that was his style last night. he seems to have to have the last word. that was disappointing. >> kathy fenton asked about equal pay for women. >> specifically with females making only 72% of what men make. >> reporter: romney's response was the comment about binders that went viral. we called them today about it. >> you know, i can't say i felt my question was answered by either candidate, explicitly. >> reporter: also, they didn't like the fighting. >> i did think the talk between them was a little a

-. and tom says -- it sometimes helps to create and narrative of your opponent. i remember any bush reverses a gore debate when the bush give gore and not any smile when he invaded his base. -- invaded his space. next call. california. good morning. what do you think about a sense of humor? caller: i think it is important. i think matt romney overdid it. and what up to the president way too much. that is what i think. host: how, one man can make the jokes but not the other? was the tone of? the comments? caller: i think mitt romney did a good job overall. but obama was hilarious. there are a lot of his dinners where he just really knocks it up. host: did it humanize mitt romney for you? caller: i already see him as a human. so not really. host: kathleen writes -- next call, democrat from louisiana. caller: i watched this last night when it came on. i know that they did right -- i know someone else wrote these things. but i agree with the caller that just called and. about governor romney. you know, he took too many shots at president obama. i thought president obama's jokes were better. host

imagine that a lot of the people who supported president bush in 2004 against john kerry are probably -- probably do not have a huge beef with the way president obama has executed the war, terror in afghanistan. in terms of, the drone strikes and going after osama bin laden -- the desire to get out of all these places. i do think -- i do not think that will be a big turning point in the election. >> some of your recent columns, "obama the debater looking jimmy carter look awesome." you can find that on the washington times web site. thank you so much. >> thank you for having me. >> tomorrow, on the "washington journal," we will discuss conservatives and the campaign. that is followed by energy and the campaign. mitt romney's policy and his attacks on the obama campaign. later, we will look at the $9 billion provided to states since 2002 by the center for disease control to prepare public health emergencies. "washington journal" with your calls and e-mails live at 7 eastern on c-span. >> monday, retired supreme court justice john paul stevens will talk about the second amendment and gu

blames john kerry. blames bush for the bad economy kerry for the bad debate. read the trip. you'll see that biden won it. >> i think he was told to get in there, make some commotion because he had ground to make up for. that's just a fact. i think if you're looking for the vice president to try to save the day, there's a problem. >> if obama has a performance like he had a couple weeks ago i don't believe it's possible for him to win the election. i don't know how he can possibly have another performance like that and expect to win. how could anybody be so stupid to vote for him if he performs like that again? >> we're moving rapidly to the second and third act to find out how this plays out. the president has to be on his game in the next debate debate or it could slide even more for him. >> even if he changes his style whatever political tactic the president settles on, he can't change his record and can't change his policies. the wind is at governor romney's back, you can see it on the trail, in the debate. >> the reality of the race on the ground is we're ahead. it's narrower than

a book in 2005 which held up great hope for the future of syria under bush are. if you recall there is some sense that bashar would a reformer of syria after his father died and we have now discovered that is not the case and he is now written another book called the fall of the house of assad. we are going to talk a bit about that tonight and my first question is going to be, when did you first meet assad and what was your impression of him? >> i first met him in 2004. i wanted to interview him because he was the atypical middle east dictator. he was a licensed ophthalmologist. he was not groomed to be president and only was brought back into the grooming process apparatus when his older brother who was to succeed his father died in a car accident. bashar within london getting the equivalent of an advanced degree in ophthalmology and he was brought back and raise the state apparatus until he became president when his father died in 2000 so i thought that was a very interesting story that he was different from the typical middle east dictator that i studied in history. so in 2

different from president bush, and then a question to president obama, what have you done to ear my vote. the one question on foreign policy by my count was about libya, and seemed to cover ground that we already knew the answer to. it was who denied the request for increased securities. well, we heard great testimony about that last week. there was state department officials who answered that question. so there will be some questions about those selections, bret. also speaking to the issue of their policies, their domestic policies, when it comes to jobs, we heard increased focus on the messaging. president obama saying, look, mitt romney has a sketchy plan and the math doesn't add up, and mitt romney saying, look, i think you know better to the american public about president obama's promises and saying we don't have to live like this. finally i thought it was interesting that the president saved the 47% comment for his closing remarks. mitt romney did not have the chance to respond. the president wrapping up by calling mitt romney a good man on the heels of a few weeks where his top a

Excerpts 0 to 63 of about 580 results.

Click for
next 100 results
(Some duplicates have been removed)


Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)